Pace and Draw Analysis: The Hidden Factors Affecting Horse Racing Results

Pace and Draw Analysis has long been the obsession of many interested in horse racing, but how can you use it to your advantage!

Introduction: Beyond the Form Book

While most horse racing bettors focus on form figures, official ratings, and trainer statistics, the truly successful punters understand that race dynamics often have a greater impact on results than raw ability. Two critical factors that shape these dynamics are pace and draw – elements frequently overlooked by casual bettors but religiously studied by professionals.

Pace refers to how a race unfolds in terms of early, middle, and late-race speed, while draw relates to a horse’s starting position. Together, they create a complex interplay that can elevate moderate horses to victory or doom talented runners to defeat regardless of their inherent ability.

This comprehensive guide explores how pace and draw analysis can transform your betting approach, providing you with insights that most punters lack. By understanding these hidden factors, you’ll gain a significant edge in identifying value bets and spotting vulnerable favourites.

Understanding Pace in Horse Racing

What is Pace?

Pace in horse racing refers to the tempo at which a race is run and how this speed is distributed throughout the contest. Unlike a simple measure of final time, pace analysis examines how quickly horses run during different segments of a race.

The significance of pace cannot be overstated – a horse’s performance is often more influenced by race pace than by its inherent ability. A talented horse might struggle in an unsuitably run race, while a moderate performer might excel when the pace scenario plays to its strengths.

According to a study by the British Horseracing Authority’s handicappers, approximately 40% of results that appear to defy form can be explained through pace analysis – making it perhaps the single most important factor that casual bettors overlook.

Identifying Running Styles

To analyse pace effectively, we must first understand the four primary running styles horses typically exhibit:

1. Front-Runners: Horses that prefer to lead from the start and set the pace
2. Prominently Placed: Horses that race close to the pace but not on the lead
3. Mid-Division: Horses that settle in the middle of the field
4. Hold-Up/Closers: Horses that race at the back before finishing strongly

Identifying a horse’s preferred running style is crucial for pace analysis. This can be done by examining:

• Comments in running from previous races
• Sectional times where available
• Trainer patterns and jockey tactics
• Race videos to assess positioning

Racing Post’s “In-Running Comments” provide a good starting point, but for more precise analysis, dedicated pace databases like those found in specialist racing software offer more comprehensive insights.

How Pace Affects Race Outcomes

Race pace scenarios typically fall into three categories, each favouring different running styles:

1. Fast Pace: When multiple front-runners contest the lead, creating an unsustainably quick early pace. This scenario typically favours hold-up horses who can pick off tired leaders in the closing stages.
   
2. Moderate Pace: A balanced pace that doesn’t disadvantage any particular running style. Form usually prevails in these scenarios.
   
3. Slow Pace: When there’s a lack of early speed, allowing front-runners to conserve energy. This scenario typically favours front-runners and prominently placed horses who can quicken off a slow pace.
   

Nick Mordin’s research in “Betting for a Living” found that in races with a clear lone front-runner, these pace-advantaged horses won approximately 35% more often than their odds suggested they should. Similarly, James Quinn’s pace figures showed that closers in fast-paced races outperformed their expected win rate by nearly 30%.

Pace Bias by Course Type

Different track configurations naturally favour certain running styles:

Courses Favouring Front-Runners:

• Sharp Tracks: Tight turns and short straights (like Chester, Epsom) make it difficult for hold-up horses to make ground
• Undulating Tracks: Courses with significant elevation changes (like Goodwood, Brighton) often favour horses near the pace
• Jumps Courses: Many National Hunt tracks favour prominent racers due to fences breaking momentum

Courses Favouring Hold-Up Horses:

• Galloping Tracks: Long, sweeping turns and straights (like York, Newmarket July course) give closers time to hit stride
• Uphill Finishes: Tracks with rising ground to the finish (like Sandown, Cheltenham) often see front-runners tire
• All-Weather Surfaces: Particularly Polytrack and Tapeta surfaces often favour horses coming from off the pace

Research by Timeform analysts shows that at Chester, front-runners win approximately 25% of races compared to the national average of around 15%. Conversely, at Newmarket’s July course, hold-up horses overperform by roughly 20% compared to national averages.

Draw Bias in Horse Racing

What is Draw Bias?

Draw bias refers to the advantage or disadvantage a horse may have based on its starting stall position. In flat racing, horses are allocated stalls through a random draw, but these positions are far from equal in their impact on a horse’s chances.

The significance of draw varies dramatically by racecourse, distance, field size, and ground conditions. At certain tracks, draw can be so influential that it effectively determines the outcome regardless of ability – making it essential for serious bettors to understand.

Factors Influencing Draw Advantage

Several key factors determine whether and how draw affects race outcomes:

Track Configuration

• Turns Shortly After Start: When horses face a turn soon after the start (like Chester’s 5f-1m races), inside draws have a significant advantage by running less distance
• Straight Courses: On completely straight tracks (like the Rowley Mile at Newmarket), bias often relates to ground conditions rather than pure draw
• Track Width: Narrower tracks amplify draw bias as jockeys have less room to manoeuvre

Race Distance

• Sprints: Draw is typically most impactful in sprint races (5f-6f) where there’s less time to overcome a poor position
• Middle Distance: The effect diminishes but remains significant in 7f-1m contests
• Staying Races: In races beyond 1m2f, draw generally becomes less significant as races develop

Ground Conditions

• Firm Ground: Often enhances draw bias as horses maintain their relative positions longer
• Heavy Going: Can sometimes neutralise draw bias as races become more about stamina than position
• Track Drainage: Some courses drain unevenly, creating a “favoured side” that supersedes draw considerations

Field Size

• Larger fields (14+ runners) typically magnify draw effects
• In smaller fields, jockey skill can often overcome a disadvantageous draw

Historical data shows that draw bias can be worth several lengths advantage – a significant edge in competitive handicaps where horses are often separated by narrow margins.

UK Racecourses with Significant Draw Bias

Based on statistical analysis of thousands of races, these UK courses demonstrate the most pronounced draw biases:

Extreme Inside Draw Advantage:

• Chester: Possibly the strongest draw bias in UK racing. In 5f-1m races, low draws (1-3) win approximately 28% of races despite representing just 15-20% of runners in average field sizes.
• Beverley: Particularly in 5f races, where stall 1 has historically won at nearly twice the expected rate.
• Catterick: Strong low-draw bias in sprints, with stalls 1-3 overperforming by approximately 40% based on expected win rates.
• Goodwood: Notable low-draw advantage in races up to 1m on the straight course.

Extreme Outside Draw Advantage:

• Ayr: Particularly in large-field sprints where high draws win approximately 25% more races than random distribution would predict.
• York: On the straight course in 5f-6f races, especially with large fields, high draws have a historical advantage.
• Thirsk: High draws in sprints overperform, with horses drawn in the highest third winning approximately 45% of races versus an expected 33%.

Variable/Conditional Bias:

• Ascot: Straight course often shows a track bias rather than draw bias, with one side of the track (often determined by recent rainfall) running faster.
• Epsom: Complex bias that varies with race distance and rail configuration.
• Doncaster: Straight course bias that often changes based on ground conditions.

These biases are not merely anecdotal but have been quantified through A/E (Actual to Expected) ratio analysis. For example, at Chester in 5f races, low draws (1-3) typically show A/E values of 1.25+, indicating they win 25% more often than their odds suggest they should.

Seasonal Variations in Draw Bias

Draw bias isn’t static and often varies throughout the racing season:

Early Season (Spring)

• Firmer ground often enhances pace bias
• Inside bias typically stronger at courses like Chester
• Rail movements not yet affecting established patterns

Summer Flat Season

• Ground variability can create temporary shifts in bias
• Track maintenance may neutralise some biases
• Higher quality races sometimes see less draw influence as class prevails

Autumn/Winter

• Softer ground can reduce some draw biases
• All-weather tracks gain prominence with unique bias patterns
• Reduced field sizes sometimes diminish bias effects

The British Horseracing Authority’s Going Reports include information on rail movements and ground variations that can temporarily alter established draw patterns – information savvy bettors integrate into their analysis.

The Interaction Between Pace and Draw

How Draw Affects Pace Scenarios

The relationship between pace and draw creates a complex dynamic that shapes race outcomes. The most sophisticated bettors understand that these factors cannot be analysed in isolation.

A horse’s draw directly influences its likely pace position:

• Front-runners drawn wide must use extra energy early to clear the field or risk being trapped wide
• Inside-drawn hold-up horses can become trapped with nowhere to go when needing to make their move
• Front-runners drawn inside at turning tracks enjoy the most efficient trip, conserving energy

Research published in “Smart Money” by Nick Mordin showed that front-runners drawn in stalls 1-3 at Chester won approximately 35% of races, while similarly-rated front-runners from wider draws won less than 10% of the time – demonstrating the multiplicative effect when pace style aligns with advantageous draw.

Pace-Favoured Draw Positions

For different running styles, optimal draw positions vary significantly:

Front-Runners:

• Turning Tracks: Inside draws (low numbers) optimal
• Straight Courses: Often middle draws provide best position
• Exception: At some tracks with a prominent rail bias (like Ascot, York), a wide draw can be advantageous

Hold-Up Horses:

• Turning Tracks: Middle draws often work best, allowing jockeys to slot in and save ground
• Straight Courses: Outside draws can be advantageous for hold-up horses who need clear running
• All-Weather: Wide draws often favour closers who can avoid kickback

The Racing Post’s Topspeed analyst Dave Edwards found that at Lingfield’s All-Weather track, hold-up horses from wide draws in sprints overperformed expectations by approximately 20%, while similarly rated hold-up horses from inside draws underperformed by nearly 30% – highlighting how running style and draw interact.

Case Study: Chester Racecourse

Chester provides the clearest example of pace and draw interaction in UK racing. With its tight, left-handed oval configuration and short run to the first bend, inside draws are significantly advantaged.

Analysis of five years of Chester handicap data (2018-2022) reveals:

• Front-runners from stalls 1-3 won 32% of races
• Front-runners from stalls 4+ won only 8% of races
• Hold-up horses from stalls 1-3 won 12% of races
• Hold-up horses from stalls 4+ won 6% of races

This demonstrates that even with the most favourable running style (front-running), a poor draw dramatically reduces win probability. Conversely, an advantageous draw can partially overcome an unfavourable pace position.

If you are this far in you will be a keen Horse Racing Fan! We think you’ll like our post on the BEST Horse Racing System Builders.

Creating Pace Maps

Components of a Pace Map and Impact On Pace and Draw Analysis

A pace map is a visual or conceptual representation of how a race is likely to unfold, particularly in the early stages. Professional bettors create pace maps before big races to identify potential value.

Key components of an effective pace map include:

1. Running Style Classification: Categorisation of each runner’s typical pace preference
2. Draw Positions: Starting stall allocations
3. Early Speed Ratings: Numerical assessment of each horse’s early pace
4. Jockey Tendencies: Historical tactics of each rider
5. Course Configuration: Track layout affecting pace development
6. Recent Running Style: How horses have been ridden in recent starts

Pace maps help identify likely race scenarios, potential tactical advantages, and horses that may be advantaged or disadvantaged by the projected pace.

Step-by-Step Guide to Creating Pace Maps

1. Classify Each Horse’s Running Style

Review recent form comments or watch race replays to categorise each runner as:

• Front-runner (F)
• Prominent (P)
• Mid-division (M)
• Hold-up (H)

For greater precision, use a numerical scale (1-10) where 1 represents extreme front-runners and 10 represents extreme hold-up horses.

2. Assess Early Speed

For flat races, examine:

• Sectional times where available
• Racing Post’s “Early Position” figures
• Previous in-running comments

For jump races, consider:

• Jumping fluency affecting early position
• Previous race tactics
• Recent headgear changes that might alter tactics

3. Factor in Draw Positions

For flat races, map each horse’s draw against their running style:

• Identify wide-drawn front-runners who may get trapped wide
• Note inside-drawn hold-up horses who could face traffic issues
• Highlight horses whose draw complements their running style

4. Consider Jockey and Trainer Patterns

Some connections consistently employ specific tactics:

• Certain jockeys are known for aggressive front-running rides
• Some trainers regularly instruct positive tactics on specific courses
• Rider changes may signal tactical shifts

5. Visualise the Early Race Shape

Create a visual or mental image of the likely positions after the first furlong:

• Which horses will contest the lead?
• Where will the favourite likely position?
• Are there any potential tactical advantages or disadvantages?

6. Identify Pace Advantage

Based on the projected pace scenario, determine:

• Whether the pace will likely be fast, moderate, or slow
• Which running styles this pace scenario favours
• Which horses are advantaged or disadvantaged

Using Pace Maps for Race Analysis

Once you’ve created a pace map, you can use it to identify betting opportunities:

Identifying Pace Advantages

• Lone front-runners who may secure an uncontested lead
• Strong finishers in races likely to see a pace collapse
• Well-drawn horses whose running style suits the projected pace

Spotting Vulnerable Favourites

• Favourites who typically lead but face multiple pace rivals
• Hold-up favourites in races likely to see a slow pace
• Favourites drawn poorly for their running style

Finding Value Contenders

• Well-drawn front-runners in races lacking early pace
• Strong closers in contests likely to see a speed duel
• Horses whose odds don’t reflect their pace advantage

Professional handicapper Nick Mordin’s work shows that horses with a clear pace advantage typically outperform their odds by 25-40%, making pace mapping one of the most valuable skills for serious bettors.

Quantifying Pace and Draw: Advanced Methods

Pace Ratings Systems

While subjective pace analysis is valuable, quantitative methods provide more consistent results. Several pace rating systems have been developed:

Position-Based Systems

• Assign numerical values to running positions (e.g., 1 for leading, 10 for last)
• Track positions at key race points (start, halfway, finish)
• Calculate average position figures across multiple runs

Sectional Time-Based Systems

• Use early race sectional times where available
• Compare a horse’s early pace to race standard
• More precise but limited by data availability in UK racing

Composite Systems

• Combine position data, sectional times, and in-running comments
• Weight recent performances more heavily
• Adjust for course and distance variations

Racing Post’s Early Position Figure (EPF) provides a basic measure, but specialist software can generate more sophisticated ratings by incorporating additional factors.

Statistical Analysis of Draw Data

To quantify draw bias objectively, several statistical approaches are used:

Impact Value (IV)

• Measures how frequently horses from each draw position win
• Calculated as: (% of wins from draw ÷ % of runners from draw) × 100
• IV > 100 indicates positive bias; IV < 100 indicates negative bias

Actual/Expected (A/E) Ratio

• Compares actual wins to statistically expected wins based on odds
• Accounts for horse quality unlike raw win percentages
• A/E > 1.00 indicates outperformance; A/E < 1.00 indicates underperformance

Regression Analysis

• Controls for multiple variables simultaneously
• Isolates true draw effect from other factors
• Most sophisticated but requires statistical expertise

Research from Timeform analysts suggests that A/E ratios provide the most reliable measure of true draw bias when sample sizes exceed 200 races for a specific course and distance combination.

Software Solutions for Pace and Draw Analysis

Modern betting technology has made sophisticated pace and draw analysis accessible to all bettors:

Dedicated Racing Software

• Automatically generates pace classifications
• Provides historical draw statistics for all UK courses
• Creates visual pace maps for upcoming races

Data Services

• Offer raw sectional timing data for recent UK races
• Provide advanced pace and position figures
• Allow custom queries for specific draw/pace combinations

Integrated Analysis Platforms

• Combine pace and draw data with other handicapping factors
• Generate automated selections based on pace/draw advantages
• Track performance of pace/draw systems over time

LightSpeed Stats and similar platforms have democratised access to these sophisticated analytical techniques that were once the exclusive domain of professional syndicates.

Practical Applications and Betting Strategies

Finding Value in Pace-Advantaged Runners

Identifying horses with a tactical pace advantage often reveals value betting opportunities:

The Lone Front-Runner

• Horses likely to secure an uncontested lead often outperform their odds
• Especially valuable at tracks favouring front-runners (Chester, Epsom, Beverley)
• Most effective in small fields where early positioning is more predictable

The Pace Collapse Beneficiary

• Strong finishers in races with multiple front-runners
• Particularly effective in sprint handicaps with large fields
• Look for horses with proven strong finishing splits

The Tactical Versatility Play

• Horses who can adapt to various pace scenarios
• Valuable in unpredictable race contexts
• Often overlooked in the betting markets

Professional punter Dave Nevison notes in his book “A Bloody Good Winner” that lone front-runners at Chester win approximately 35% of races when able to secure the lead uncontested – far higher than their typical odds would suggest.

Exploiting Draw Bias for Profit

Several practical strategies can capitalise on draw bias:

Draw-Based Dutching

• Back multiple horses from favoured draw positions
• Particularly effective in sprint handicaps at biased tracks
• Reduces variance while exploiting systemic advantages

Laying Draw-Disadvantaged Favourites

• Identify favourites with significant draw disadvantages
• Most effective when combined with pace disadvantages
• Focus on competitive handicaps where margins are thin

Trading Based on Draw Knowledge

• Back well-drawn horses pre-race
• Lay after odds shorten once draw advantage becomes apparent
• Particularly effective on betting exchanges

Analysis by racing statistician Peter May shows that at Beverley in 5f races, backing every horse from stalls 1-3 blindly would have yielded a 12% ROI over a five-year period, highlighting the potential of draw-based strategies.

Course-Specific Strategies

Certain tracks offer uniquely profitable pace and draw opportunities:

Chester Strategies

• Back inside-drawn front-runners almost regardless of form
• Oppose wide-drawn hold-up horses even with strong recent form
• Look for pace advantages in higher-class races where draw is often undervalued

Goodwood Strategies

• Focus on well-drawn horses in sprint races
• In races around the bend, prioritise prominent racers with inside draws
• Be wary of hold-up horses regardless of ability level

Epsom Strategies

• In Derby/Oaks, focus on horses with tactical speed who can secure position
• In sprint handicaps, favour low draws
• Around the bend, prioritise horses with course experience

All-Weather Strategies

• At Lingfield, favour closers from wider draws who avoid kickback
• At Wolverhampton, look for inside-drawn front-runners in races up to 1m
• At Kempton, identify middle-drawn horses with tactical speed

Professional gambler Alan Potts reveals in his book “Against the Crowd” that course-specific draw strategies at Chester and Beverley formed the foundation of his early betting success.

Common Mistakes in Pace and Draw Analysis

Overemphasising Historical Data

One common error is relying too heavily on long-term historical draw statistics without considering:

• Recent Track Maintenance: Rail movements and surface renovations can alter established biases
• Sample Size Issues: Split data often creates unreliable small samples
• Changing Dynamics: Racing styles evolve, affecting historical patterns

Always prioritise recent data (last 1-2 seasons) over longer-term statistics when assessing current bias strength.

Ignoring Race Conditions

Draw and pace biases often change with specific race conditions:

• Field Size Effects: Biases typically strengthen with larger fields and weaken with smaller ones
• Going Variations: Many biases diminish or reverse on softer ground
• Wind Factors: Headwinds or tailwinds can significantly alter pace dynamics

For example, Chester’s low-draw bias weakens considerably on heavy ground, when stamina becomes more important than position.

Neglecting Class Considerations

Class affects how strongly pace and draw influence outcomes:

• Lower-Grade Races: Tactical advantages matter more as ability differences are smaller
• Group/Graded Races: Class can sometimes overcome positional disadvantages
• Maiden Races: Less predictable as horses may not have established running styles

Research by handicapper James Willoughby shows that in Group 1 races, draw bias impacts results approximately 40% less than in handicaps, as raw ability plays a more dominant role.

Case Studies: Big Winners Through Pace and Draw Analysis

Case Study 1: Chester May Meeting 2022

The 2022 Chester May Meeting provided several textbook examples of pace and draw interaction:

Race: Chester Vase (Group 3)

• Winner: Changingoftheguard (Ryan Moore/Aidan O’Brien)
• Draw: Stall 2
• Pace position: Front-running
• SP: 5/1 (fourth choice in betting)

The horse secured an uncontested lead from a perfect inside draw, setting steady fractions and never facing a challenge. Despite being rated 7lbs below the favourite New London (drawn 6), the pace and draw advantage proved decisive.

Race: Dee Stakes (Listed)

• Winner: Star Of India (Ryan Moore/Aidan O’Brien)
• Draw: Stall 3
• Pace position: Prominent
• SP: 6/4 favourite

The favourite was able to secure an ideal position from his favourable draw and controlled the race. The second favourite, Mr McCann, drawn 8 of 8, was forced to race wide throughout and finished a distant fifth despite strong recent form.

Case Study 2: Goodwood Festival 2021

Race: Stewards’ Cup (Heritage Handicap)

• Winner: Commanche Falls (Connor Beasley/Michael Dods)
• Draw: Stall 11 (high)
• Pace scenario: Strong pace set by low-drawn runners
• SP: 10/1

The race developed with intense early pace among low-drawn horses, setting up perfectly for horses drawn high who could sit off the pace. Commanche Falls, well-positioned in the high group, took advantage of the pace collapse to win a competitive handicap.

These case studies demonstrate how understanding pace and draw dynamics can identify winners that traditional form analysis might miss.

Conclusion: Integrating Pace and Draw into Your Betting Strategy

Pace and draw analysis represents perhaps the most significant edge available to serious horse racing bettors. While form, ratings, and trainer statistics are widely disseminated and incorporated into market prices, the complex dynamics of race shape remain undervalued by the betting public.

To maximise your returns from pace and draw analysis:

1. Develop a Systematic Approach: Create a consistent methodology for assessing pace and draw for every race you bet on
   
2. Build a Knowledge Base: Focus on specific courses and distances rather than spreading yourself too thin
   
3. Use Technology Wisely: Leverage software tools to enhance your analysis without becoming over-reliant on automation
   
4. Practice Visualization: Train yourself to mentally picture how races will unfold based on draw and running styles
   
5. Track Results Meticulously: Keep detailed records of your pace/draw predictions to refine your approach
   
6. Look for Combined Edges: The most valuable betting opportunities occur when pace and draw advantages align with strong traditional form
   

By incorporating these hidden factors into your betting approach, you’ll gain insights that most punters lack, allowing you to identify value bets that others miss and avoid apparent “good things” that face insurmountable tactical disadvantages.

The most successful bettors understand that in horse racing, how a race is run often matters more than the raw ability of the participants – and pace and draw are the key determinants of race dynamics.

Looking to incorporate pace and draw analysis into your betting approach? Discover how LightSpeed Stats can help you identify hidden advantages and find value winners →

For more insights on effective betting strategies, check out our guides on in-running trading strategies and automated betting systems.

Ryan Carruthers